I'm classy like that.
And that is why we call you, Your Highness!
Posted by bogup on April 14, 2007 | Reply
Honestly, it's not as bad as it looks. I actually did realize that I had misspelled "drunk" as "drukn" in last night's entry. But instead of posting an edit, I accidentally posted a duplicate copy. After I realized that I had made two entries, I went to delete the one with the misspelling, but accidentally deleted the one that was corrected instead.
Okay, I guess that actually is as bad as it looks.
But what's surprising here is not my drunken behavior. It's the fact that everybody in the comments wants to see a picture of me wearing a thong. I'm guessing this would not have been the case had I mentioned is was a ladies thong. Naturally, this being the age of digital cameras and such, photos were taken...

And yes, I was wearing the thong over my jeans because, even in a drunken state, I realize that nobody wants to actually see a guy wearing a ladies thong. It's not even remotely "cute" because your junk would be all hanging out...

Now, had it been a mens thong with a proper pouch for my kibble and bits, then I probably would have taken my jeans off first.
I'm classy like that.
I'm classy like that.
And that is why we call you, Your Highness!
Posted by bogup on April 14, 2007 | Reply
wow...a red devil thong and don't get me wrong, but on the photo it looks a little wet in the center ;-)
Posted by Andre on April 14, 2007 | Reply
You censored it! How are we supposed to judge the gross reality if we can't SEE it?
*Grumble* Highly disappointing.
Posted by Caffeinated Librarian on April 14, 2007 | Reply
You know, since that pic doesn't show a face, that thong-wearing person could be anyone.
Now's your chance to pass this one off... like farting in a crowded elevator.
Posted by ChillyWilly on April 14, 2007 | Reply
Despite your plausible explanation for wearing jeans underneath them... I am still kinda bummed about you not going all the way.. *sigh*
Posted by DutchBitch on April 15, 2007 | Reply
Bah! We do not like that euphemism for a dude's junk! "Kibble.." etc. NO! We vote no, and may we point out that we are a big fan of men's junk. It is a language thing; we are also a big fan of language.
Posted by Catherine on April 15, 2007 | Reply
Very glad to see the phrase "kibbles and bits" getting some play. I saw it over at go Fug Yourself and have been hoping against hope that it would be the new hot term of the decade. It's just so descriptive and friendly sounding.
That all said, I'll pass on you actually wearing the thong, like, for real.
Posted by MotherReader on April 17, 2007 | Reply

I love comments! However, all comments are moderated, and won't appear until approved. Are you an abusive troll with nothing to contribute? Don't bother. Selling something? Don't bother. Spam linking? Don't bother.
PLEASE NOTE: My comment-spam protection requires JavaScript... if you have it turned off or are using a mobile device without JavaScript, commenting won't work. Sorry.
|
|
